Blockade against Qatar creates unprecedented political uproar in the region
Abdullah al-Ahsan who is professor of comparative history at the Department of History and Civilization in International Islamic University in Malaysia, wrote a remarkable article about Qatar crisis.
Professor Abdullah al-Ahsan stressed the severing diplomatic and commercial relations with Qatar decision of the Gulf countries has created an unprecedented political uproar in the region in his column on blockade against Qatar.
You can read the full text of article of Professor Abdullah al-Ahsan below:
The decision by Bahrain, Saudi Arabia, the U.A.E. and Egypt on June 5 to sever diplomatic and commercial relations with Qatar has created an unprecedented political uproar in the region. Similar crises had emerged before too, but this time the assault seems far more severe not only because some other small players such as Maldives, Mauritania and Yemen have joined the group, but the unpredictable U.S. President Donald Trump has come forward with his support for the action.
With the closure of Qatar's air, sea and land links disrupting its exports and imports particularly affecting food supplies, the situation has turned grave. A gleeful Avigdor Lieberman, Israel's defense minister, is also reported to have praised the measures against Qatar because he finds "many possibilities of cooperation in the struggle against terror"  in the action.
Is Qatar so dangerous for the rest of the world? What has the tiny Gulf state done to cause so much "security threat" to neighboring countries and beyond?
- What is Qatar's fault?
Qatar has been accused of supporting terror groups and the Palestinian Hamas has been identified as one of those groups. But what kind of assistance has Qatar really provided to Hamas? Has Qatar provided Hamas with arms to fight Israel, for example? The fact is that Israel and Egypt have jointly blocked Gaza, causing huge humanitarian affliction for the people in the Strip. Yes, Qatar has sent humanitarian assistance to Gaza and perhaps granted visas to some Hamas leaders to temporarily reside in the country. But is it Qatar's fault that the people of Gaza have elected Hamas to represent them? Should Qatar then have ignored the sufferings of the Gazan people?
One should remember in this context that King Abdul Aziz ibn Saud, the founder of modern Saudi Arabia, was a strong supporter of the Palestinian cause. He strongly protested against President Truman's decision to recognize Israel in 1948 and rejected an American grant for Saudi Arabia. He strongly believed that the United States had violated the rights of Palestinians by supporting the creation of the state of Israel in Palestine. The king's position on the issue was no different than the position that Hamas holds today on the question of Palestine.
Qatar has also been accused of supporting the Egyptian Islamist group the Muslim Brotherhood (MB). What sort of assistance has Qatar provided to MB other than humanitarian? More than half-a-century ago when Egyptian MB encountered persecution at home, many of its members sought shelter in Saudi Arabia. Wise leaders in Saudi Arabia did provide them with shelter, but as a result Saudi Arabia benefitted a lot too. At a time when Saudi Arabia had very few educated and trained manpower, highly professional and qualified MB members made significant contributions to the creation of what is Saudi Arabia today. Why have the MB members lost Saudi goodwill? Answer to this question may be connected to the current crisis.
- Real reason behind crisis
According to an analyst, "The real reason behind the diplomatic fallout may be far simpler, and once again has to do with a long-running and controversial topic, namely Qatar's regional natural gas dominance."  But this may be too simplistic. David Hearst of the Middle East Eye in an article enumerates "three potential motives behind the tension between Qatar and its Gulf neighbors", and identifies "to finish the job  started in June 2013 when Morsi was toppled" as one of the motives, and to us this makes sense.
Morsi was a MB member and the only civilian in Egypt's history to have been elected by the people. If a terrorist is defined as "a person who uses unlawful violence and intimidation, especially against civilians, in the pursuit of political aims" -- as is defined by an English dictionary  -- then who is a terrorist? Morsi, the first civilian president of the country elected in a credible election, or Abdul Fattah al-Sisi, who usurped power from Morsi by force?
Fundamentally the ancient regimes in the region did not seem happy about the 2011 uprisings and seemed to hold Qatar responsible for educating people to stand for their rights. Therefore, Qatar's fault was to establish the Al-Jazeera news networks, bringing BBC's Doha debate to the country, establish think-tanks, and a number of American universities in Qatar to educate not only Qataris but also everybody in the region. Why are the accusers against Qatar so afraid of education? Do they consider the people in the region foolish? Do the people not understand what is good and what is harmful for them?
- Timing of action against Qatar
The timing of the action by Bahrain, Egypt, Saudi Arabia and the U.A.E. is important. Why have they taken this rather extreme step now? These countries were already concerned because of the Arab uprisings of 2011 but became furious since the Egyptian MB received people's mandate in 2012. While holding Qatari news media responsible for such developments, they perhaps thought that the Trump presidency would facilitate them in achieving their mischievous objective to eliminate the popular movement. However, they do not seem to know the fact that the U.S. has a constitution that ensures checks and balances. No matter how unpredictable a president could be, the president cannot impose his whimsical determination on the nation. More than a week has passed and there is no sign that the embargo against Qatar is receiving U.S. support. In fact, Trump's tweets and statements have been challenged by a number of government institutions including the State Department and the Pentagon.
- Role of the Muslim World
In this context it is painful to see the statement by the General Secretariat of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) asking Qatar "to honor its previous commitments and agreements signed within the Gulf Cooperation Council [GCC], particularly with regard to ceasing support for terrorist groups and their activities and ending media incitement."  Does the OIC want Qatar to abandon its commitment to humanitarian causes? Particularly in this month of Ramadan? Such an act will not only violate the teachings of Islamic Shari'ah, but also OIC's Cairo declaration of Human Rights and the UN declaration of Human Rights. It should be remembered that when the OIC was established, its general secretariat was supposed to be located in Jerusalem. But since Jerusalem was under Israeli occupation, Saudi King Faisal persuaded OIC member states to temporarily host the OIC headquarter in Jeddah. Now Saudi Arabia seems to have made the OIC its home property. Recently, it has fired its secretary general reportedly on the recommendation of Egypt without even consulting other members of the organization. In this context one must note that Al-Azhar's fatwah on the role of Qatar is shameful.
As for other Muslim countries, on top of the vassal governments in Yemen and Libya, tiny Maldives and Mauritania have declared their support for the Saudi-Emirati action. But heavy weights such as Turkey and Iran have come forward with their strong support for Qatar. Turkey has even come forward with military assistance for Qatar. This is a very timely gesture on the part of Turkey. It is unfortunate that Indonesia, Malaysia and Pakistan are almost silent on the crisis. Does one need to take sides in such conflicts? Have Kuwait and Oman, GCC member countries, not declared their positions? Can one not declare a position on the basis of principles? Is it ethical and Islamic to declare such a war-like embargo against the brotherly country of Qatar during the month of Ramadan? The Saudi-led action against Qatar is wrong because the blockade seems to have been mainly against food supplies to Qatar. It is almost unimaginable for an ordinary Muslim to try and subject any individual to starvation in such a mischievous manner.
- Israeli connection
The leaked email correspondence of the U.A.E.'s ambassador to Washington has demonstrated "that there is a growing axis between some of the Gulf countries like Saudi Arabia and the U.A.E. and Israel."  Therefore, Avigdor Lieberman's gleeful desire for cooperation on the pretext of security should not surprise observers of ongoing developments in the region. Many other Israeli leaders have also been cheerful and hopeful  about the possible outcome of the Qatar crisis. According to the Jerusalem Post, "Israel benefits when it is not the center of attention and certainly when it is not under pressure. This is a boon for the government."  Zionism's greater Israel project  has already succeeded in splitting Iraq and Syria into many sectarian pieces, the Gulf crisis will perhaps extend that sectarianism and tribalism to the extended region. This is not to suggest that Israel alone is responsible for the civil war in Iraq and Syria, but Israel knows very well how to take advantage of a youth that have lost hope and are suffering from severe economic difficulties. And Qatar's failure as a moderate force in the region is bound to create despair, hopelessness and frustration among the youth, not only in the region but throughout the world. This will create opportunities for conspirators to recruit potential extremists to carry out seditious activities.
- Will Qatar succumb to pressure?
David Hearst, in the article quoted above, predicts: "Out of the havoc they are wreaking, a new, autonomous and modern Arabia will, eventually, emerge".  We would like to add that this new modern Arabia will be based on principles of caring for one another, human dignity and self-respect; not on the basis of the superiority of races, tribes or lineages. Qatar survived similar attacks in 2014 and came out stronger. This time too it is expected to demonstrate its resilience. Enemies of Qatar had perhaps designed to create a food shortage in the month of Ramadan, thinking that the country would succumb to pressure immediately. However, they must have miscalculated the level of spiritual strength that Ramadan brings to believers. One must not underestimate the strength of the spirituality of Qataris.
It is interesting to note that the social media in these countries seem to have reacted sharply against the measures on Qatar. That is why they have now banned people from even publishing expressions of sympathy  towards Qatar  in the social media. This is a sign of desperation and usually defeated parties adopt such attitudes toward such acts. There is a strong possibility that Qatar will come out much stronger from this crisis.